Good-bye page
Thank You for Completing the Course!

Thank you for your dedication in working through this material. You've learned something more durable than any product tutorial: the mental models, workflows, and disciplines of AI-assisted development โ direction, context, verification, and security โ that transfer to whatever tool you use next.
๐ The whole course in one breath
Treat the AI as a fast, literal, un-accountable junior engineer. Direct it well (rules, context, prompts, specs) and verify it well (review, tests, security). Learn the category and the standards, not one product's buttons.
๐งญ Keep learning โ organized by durable concept
We deliberately lead with canonical, maintained sources โ specs, official docs, and standards bodies โ over individual creators. These are still useful in two years.
Project context & standards
- agents.md โ the open, cross-tool standard for project instruction files (spec + examples).
- modelcontextprotocol.io ยท github.com/modelcontextprotocol โ the MCP spec, reference servers, and SDKs.
Prompt & context engineering
(Read more than one โ you're learning the shared principles, not one vendor's quirks.)
Tools (official docs โ canonical, not YouTube)
- Claude Code docs ยท Cursor docs ยท OpenAI Codex ยท Aider
Spec-driven development
- GitHub Spec Kit โ one open, model-agnostic toolkit for spec-first workflows.
Community example banks (useful, but tool-specific โ label them as such)
- Awesome Cursor Rules โ community
.cursor/rulesexamples. Handy inspiration; remember your portable base isAGENTS.md. - Awesome MCP Servers โ maintained catalog of MCP servers (apply the trust caution before installing any).
Opinion / news (optional โ clearly one creator's take)
- A couple of creator channels (e.g. Fireship for fast explainers, Theo for deep dives) are fine for staying current โ just treat them as opinion, not canonical reference.
๐ How to tell what's actually good โ benchmarks & your own evals
You'll constantly face "which model/tool is best right now?" Answer it with data, not marketing:
- SWE-bench (Verified) โ an execution-based coding benchmark: does the model's patch make real tests pass? A durable comparison method, not a fixed ranking.
- โ ๏ธ Caveat: benchmarks are signal, not gospel. Leaderboards can be gamed or contaminated by training data โ in Feb 2026 OpenAI publicly stepped back from SWE-bench Verified over exactly this. Use them as one input.
- ๐งช Build your own tiny eval set โ 5โ20 real tasks from your codebase with known-good outcomes, run candidates against them. Nothing predicts performance on your work like your work. (See Choosing Models & Tools.)
๐ฏ Don't memorize a ranking that expires next month โ keep the method: public benchmark + your own evals.
Last reviewed: 2026-07. This resource list is a maintained artifact โ links and tools drift; the concepts they map to don't. If you spot something stale, that's feedback we'd love.
Happy โ and careful โ building. ๐
Member discussion